Pick a priest, any priest, from the database in Boston, he was likely worse than Epstein.
At age 5 and 6, I had a sexual relationship with a Catholic priest. 40 years later news stories started to show up about other people who were molested by Catholic priests as children.
In 1996 when the internet became available in homes, I got a computer and typed in “molested by Catholic priest” and dozens of other people, victims of the same sex crime, entered my life through support groups online, list-servs mostly run by people in Australia at the time.
Our numbers grew. There's a database in Boston, bishopaccountability dot org, that shows credible proven cases of more than 10,000 priests molesting God knows how many children in my lifetime.
This was grown men under the protection of the priesthood having invasive sex with children; in my case I was so young I didn't even know what he was doing, I didn't know what sex was. Plus when my older sister got to be about 11, he dropped her for me at age 5, and messed up our entire family dynamics forever.
So why are all these Epstein news stories today saying things like, he was the worst pedophile in history? Pick a priest, any priest, from the database in Boston, he was likely worse than Epstein.
I get the sense that in 2025 no one knows any history beyond a Google search. Our reporters don't know anything past the most recent press release, which when I was in the news business if you read a press release or even referred to one you were laughed out of the newsroom. Now press releases are all these mainstream news dunderheads read.
It's made me so sad to see intelligent sources such as Meidas Touch and Malcolm Nance fall for this obvious media manipulation. While everyone listens with so much compassion to the Epstein victims as they tell their stories, troops are entering our cities, newly constructed prisons and concentration camps are filling up, the global climate crisis is disastrous, starving Gazans relocated to make room for potentate condos, Ukraine is bombed daily; if you don't see that Epstein non-news is a major political diversion at a very high level, then you don't deserve to be in the profession of news reporting anymore; get a blog like the rest of us and struggle.
Compare the news coverage Epstein is getting to the news coverage 100,000 victims of 10,000 Catholic priests got and you can't help but wonder why is one so big and the other so small?
The answer is, pedophile priest victims didn't have Rupert Murdoch spreading their story. SMH at how naive and easily manipulated Americans are.
JD Vance met with Murdoch in early July, next day the WSJ story came out, saying nothing we did not already know about Epstein in 2016, and kicked off this current media frenzy, Figure It Out!
pedophile priest Database: https://www.bishop-accountability.org/
*
Kay Ebeling, blogger
(Click here to read episodes in Pedophile Priest True Crime Series)
No comments:
Post a Comment