Not just L.A., the City of Angels Is Everywhere
From 2017, read Transcripts documenting the coup interviews with Malcolm Nance

Home of The Covid-19 Transcripts and The Heating Planet Project
Funded by readers through PayPal, available for all to read

Tuesday, October 21, 2025

Who’s Getting Rich Off Climate Change? 2- As the planet burns, balance sheets bloom- Report w transcript, Heating Planet blog

Here is the other video of that title that showed up this morning on YouTube: As the planet burns, balance sheets bloom. For every degree of warming,  someone is making money. We were told climate change was a crisis, a shared threat to our existence. But for a select few, it became something else entirely, a business plan, an unprecedented opportunity- Financial Delusion channel report Oct 21-Who’s Getting Rich Off Climate Change? transcript continues below-

Financial Delusion Joined Oct 8, 2025 no country of origin listed: 

Transcript:

This isn't a story about saving the world. It's a story about who profits from its destruction. For decades, the narrative  was simple. Pollution was the  unfortunate byproduct of progress. But  behind the scenes, a radical idea was  taking hold. What if we didn't have to  stop the problem to solve it? What if we  could simply dot dot dot price it? This  shift didn't happen in a climate summit  or a science lab. It happened here on  Wall Street in the boardrooms of the  world's most powerful financial  institutions. 


The 2010s changed  everything. Climate wasn't just a  problem. It became an asset class. The  architects of this new market weren't  environmentalists.  They were investment bankers,  commodities traders, and risk analysts.  They saw the chaos of a changing climate  not as a catastrophe, but as volatility,  and where there is volatility, there is  money to be made. 


They looked at melting  glaciers and saw shipping routes. They  looked at droughts and saw futures and  water. They looked at the very air we  breathe and saw a new commodity to be  bought and sold. The language of crisis  was quietly replaced by the language of  the market. derivatives, offsets, and  futures. The goal was no longer  prevention. It was portfolio management.  


The invisible hand of the market was now  reaching out to control the weather  itself, turning an existential threat  into a balance sheet entry. The real  revolution came when carbon became  tradable. Suddenly, pollution wasn't a  moral failing. It was a line item, a  cost, a predictable expense. This  created a sophisticated global market  where companies could buy the right to  pollute from someone else who polluted  less. It was branded as a brilliant  solution, a market-driven path to a  cleaner future. But what it really did  was create a system of indulgences. A  company could continue pumping emissions  into the atmosphere as long as they  bought a credit from a project halfway  across the world. A project whose real  world impact was often difficult, if not  impossible, to verify. 


Pollution became  predictable. A cost to be managed, not a  crime to be stopped. The atmosphere was  now a ledger, and the world's biggest  polluters were just playing the numbers.  At the same time, another industry was  undergoing a quiet, lucrative  transformation, insurance. For  centuries, insurers managed risk based  on historical data. But with a climate  in chaos, the past was no longer a  reliable guide. So, they pivoted. 


They  became fortune tellers using  sophisticated climate models not to  protect people but to protect their own  profits. Insurance firms began rewriting  the map. They redland entire zip codes  deeming them too risky to ensure against  floods, fires, and storms. Premiums for  those who could still get coverage  skyrocketed. They were no longer  insuring against disaster. They were  betting on it. 


For every home lost to a  rising tide, a reinssurer in London or  Zurich had already calculated the odds  and set their price. They were  protecting their assets, not ours. While  insurers bet on disaster, hedge funds  saw an even more fundamental  opportunity. They began a quiet  acquisition spree, targeting the one  resource more essential than oil, water.  


In droughtstricken regions from  California to Australia, they bought up  vast water rights, not for farming or  sustainability, but for scarcity. The  logic was brutally simple. As the world  gets hotter and drier, water becomes  more valuable. They weren't investing in  conservation. They were investing in a  future where taps run dry. When the well  is empty, the price on the open market  soars. 


These funds aren't selling  water. They're selling control over who  gets it and at what price. The market  still flows even when the rivers don't.  It's the ultimate arbitrage play on  human survival. 


Perhaps the most  brilliant maneuver was the rebranding of  the polluters themselves. The same oil  and gas giants that had spent decades  funding climate deniialism suddenly  transformed into energy leaders. They  draped their logos and green, filled  their commercials with images of wind  turbines and solar panels and sponsored  climate conferences. Their message was  clear. We're part of the solution. 


But  behind the glossy ads, the business  model remained largely unchanged. For  every dollar invested in renewables,  many more went into new oil and gas  exploration. They didn't stop drilling.  They just started talking more about  trees. It was a masterclass in corporate  communication, a way to secure a social  license to operate in a world that was  turning against them. They sold us a  story of transformation while quietly  doubling down on the status quo. Saving  the planet became a brand and business  was booming. The system wasn't broken.  It was working exactly as designed. 


The  first chapter of this story wasn't about  failure. It was about the successful  creation of a new trillion dollar market  built on the foundations of a planetary  crisis. The illusion was complete. A  world where you could trade your way out  of a catastrophe where every disaster  had a silver lining for someone's  portfolio and where the market, not  science, would have the final say.


 But  this was only the beginning. The green  gold rush was about to accelerate,  creating a new class of winners and  losers and blurring the line between  salvation and speculation. Carbon  markets turned the air we breathe into a  financial instrument. The concept was  elegant. Cap emissions and let companies  trade permits to pollute. This turned  pollution into profit, a system where  every ton of CO has a price tag. 


Traders  in green lit exchanges, far from any  smoke stack, now speculate on the future  of our atmosphere. They aren't buying or  selling a physical thing. They are  trading an abstraction, a permission  slip to alter the planet's climate. It  created a world where a factory in one  country could continue polluting by  funding a tree planting project in  another. A transaction that looks good  on paper, but does little to reduce the  overall concentration of carbon in the  sky. 


To fuel this new economy,  governments stepped in. They poured  billions in subsidies into renewables,  not purely for virtue, but for velocity.  The race was on. Green became the new  gold. This state-backed capital  injection created a boom, turning solar  and wind from niche technologies into  massive industrial scale operations. It  was a windfall for the companies that  manufactured the panels, built the  turbines, and secured the government  contracts. 


But it also turned clean  energy into another commodity, another  asset for investment funds to flip for a  quick return. The focus shifted from a  slow, steady transition to a high-speed,  highstakes gold rush, where the biggest  prize went to those who could scale the  fastest. 


The outcome was inevitable. 


The  profits went upward. 


The floods did not.  


For every billionaire minted in the  green finance boom, there were  communities left behind. The new elite  built luxury eco villages powered by  state-of-the-art renewables. While just  a few miles away, towns were inundated  by rising sea levels. Their insurance  canceled, their futures washed away. 


The  wealth generated by the green economy  rarely trickled down. It concentrated at  the top among the venture capitalists,  the fund managers, and the executives of  the new clean energy conglomerates. This  wasn't a just transition. It was a  wealth transfer disguised in the  language of sustainability. 


In a world  on fire, image is everything. This gave  rise to the corporate redemption myth.  CEOs who once presided over  environmental disasters now give  inspiring TED talks on sustainability.  ESG investors, those who measure  companies by environmental, social, and  governance metrics, smile for press  cameras, celebrating their portfolio's  positive impact. 


Net zero became the  ultimate buzzword, a promise of future  virtue that required little present-day  sacrifice. It wasn't a goal. It was a  slogan. A marketing tool to attract  investors and appease consumers,  allowing business as usual to continue  under a veneer of responsibility. It's  the art of looking green without the  inconvenient cost of being green. 


We  once thought money could fix anything,  even the climate. We built a system to  price our own survival, believing the  market would find the most efficient  path to salvation. But we created  something else. a speculative bubble  built on the planet's health. 


What  happens when profit becomes the planet's  last resource? What happens when the  market decides that a managed decline is  more profitable than a sustainable  future? The truth is, we are all  investors in this story, whether we know  it or not. The returns are just being  calculated in degrees Celcius. Thank you for watching.


***

Financial Delusion Joined Oct 8, 2025- the channel that dissects the hidden illusions and stories governing global finance. We look past the headlines, auditing the history where money, power, and psychology collide. no country of origin stated 


***

Who's getting rich off climate change? 1 Some people argue whether it's real. Market already cashing in. Oct 21 report w transcript, Heating Planet blog

Two videos with that title showed up within an hour of each other this morning on YouTube. The blog copied and edited transcripts of both to produce

No comments:

Post a Comment