Not just L.A., the City of Angels Is Everywhere
From 2017, read Transcripts documenting the coup interviews with Malcolm Nance

Home of The Covid-19 Transcripts and The Heating Planet Project
Funded by readers through PayPal, available for all to read

Monday, December 15, 2025

Global warming makes microplastic spread faster and last longer; 10° jump in temp doubles rate plastic falls apart; FIrstpost Planet Pulse 5-min Dec 13 report w transcript at Heating Plabet blog

A new global review warns that climate change and plastic pollution are no longer two separate crises. Extreme heat is breaking plastic down faster; floods and cyclones are pushing fragments deeper into rivers and coastlines, and wildfires are turning homes and cars into clouds of microplastic dust. Scientists say these particles carry pesticides and forever chemicals into food systems and water. READ & WATCH Climate Crisis Driving Plastic Pollution to Spread Faster and Last Longer: Study | Planet Pulse, transcript follows-[Firstpost] Studies from Hong Kong to Brazil to Greece show the impact spreading fast, with fish stocks collapsing and microplastics showing up in marine species people eat. Researchers behind the review say the world is running out of time to treat plastic and climate as isolated problems. The planet is facing a single, fused crisis.

************
TRANSCRIPT

And now to our final story. There is a new warning that cuts through the noise around climate change and plastic pollution. A global review says these aren't two separate crises anymore, but instead one fused together. And the result is far more dangerous than what scientists thought even a few years ago.

Extreme heat is breaking plastic down faster. Floods and cyclones are pushing those fragments into rivers, coastlines, and fields. Wildfires are turning homes and cars into clouds of microplastic dust. And these fragments are turning into carriers for pesticides and forever chemicals. So, the real story today isn't just pollution. It's a system that's starting to break. And the window to slow this down is closing fast. Here is the report.

Extreme weather is accelerating plastic pollution. Heat waves, floods, fires. All of these factors are just making it deadlier. But the plastic crisis isn't just about plastic anymore. A new global study says extreme weather is turning microplastics into something far more mobile and more toxic.

Scientists reviewed hundreds of studies and say climate change is now supercharging plastic pollution, not the other way around. This time, climate change is pushing plastics deeper into our air, oceans, and even our food. And the evidence is piling up.

Higher temperatures crack plastic faster. A 10° jump in temperature can double the rate at which a piece of plastic falls apart. That means more plastic parts in places already drowning in waste. Floods and storms push these fragments further.

One typhoon in Hong Kong increased microplastics on nearby beaches by almost 40fold. And that's not it. Wildfires burn through homes and cars and turn them into clouds of microplastic dust. But the biggest shift is how dangerous these fragments become. Microplastics act like Trojan horses. They carry pesticides and forever chemicals. and higher temperatures help them absorb and release even more toxins.

Heat also speeds up the release of toxins into water types of things. Let's not use plastics, right? As much as possible if we can reduce that use because a lot of those end up getting into the wetlands. And the impacts are already showing up in rivers and coastlines.

In Brazil, researchers found some of the highest concentrations of microplastics in major estuaries. Fishermen on those waters say the change is real and painful. Pollution has a big impact. 10 years ago, I'd catch 10 kilos. Today, I catch five. The quantity, variety, and quality of fish have dropped drastically

Scientists in Brazil say the fish that are left are already contaminated. Due to all this trash, due to all this pollution, the fish have already left the region. And the fish they are catching today are already contaminated.

And this isn't just Latin America. Across the Mediterranean, Greek researchers are using mussels to track what we cannot see. Mussels filter everything. And right now, they are filtering microplastics. We usually use mussels because they're filter feeding organisms. and they accumulate a lot of contaminants in their tissues. Also, as they are consumed by humans, they are edible species. We work on them because we would like to see  the effect on the humans that consume these organisms.

And the results are worrying. Plastics don't stay large, they keep breaking down. Smaller paths mean they enter more species. And this is just the beginning. Year after year, global plastic production keeps rising. In the next years, we will find even more microplastics in the guts of the organisms. And that's why scientists behind the new global review say plastic and climate are now a single crisis. Each one makes the other worse and the world is not ready for the combined hit.

Plastic production has grown 200fold since 1950. And with oil companies shifting from fuel to plastics, that curve is only going up. So the message from researchers is blunt. We are running out of time to treat this as two separate problems because nature isn't separating them anymore. END OF TRANSCRIPT
[KE: Everything climate scientists predicted about global warming since the 1970s is coming true, only faster. This, however, is new and unexpected, I think. Surprise!]

Morocco flash flood Dec 14: Less than one hour of rain caused loss of life, immeasurable damage; Watch 2 short reports, WION and h/r channel, w transcripts at Heating Planet blog

In less than an hour, a powerful flash flood in the Safi region on Sunday  December 14 resulted in loss of life, swept away several vehicles, and caused countless damage to infrastructure, homes, and hotels. Images shared on social media show torrents of muddy water surging through the city, sweeping rubbish bins and debris, as residents scrambled for safety. Video 1 of 2: Deadly Flooding Strikes Coastal Morocco, WION Climate Tracker, more follows

[ANOTHER sudden hydro meteorological event in 2025]

TRANSCRIPT:

Moving to Morocco where sudden and devastating flash floods have now killed at least 25 people in the coastal city of Safi. Dozens more were injured as torrential rain sent walls of water rushing through streets, sweeping away cars and flooding homes. Authorities have warned more heavy rain can be on its way. Images shared on social media show torrents of muddy water surging through the city, sweeping rubbish bins and debris as residents scrambled for safety. Officials say at least 70 homes and businesses in Suffies historic old city were flooded and roads were severely damaged, cutting off several key routes to and from Atlantic Coast Port. Flood waters later began to recede, revealing a landscape coated in thick mud. Residents picked through the wreckage trying to salvage belongings from the Waterlog homes and shops. VIDEO 2 Tragedy in Morocco. Horrific scenes of flash flooding in Safi. [h/r channel Description Channel ini berisi tentang perubahan iklim dan bencana alam seperti banji,banjir bandang,hujan,hujan lebat,hujan es,angin,angin kencang,angin puting beliung, information about climate change and natural disasters such as floods, flash floods, rain, heavy rain, hail, wind, strong winds, tornadoesfrom Indonesia Joined YT Nov 6, 2025] READ & WATCH: Tragedy in Morocco!! The horrific aftermath of flash floods in Safi

TRANSCRIPT

Tragedy in Morocco. Horrific scenes of flash flooding in Safi. [footage] 

0.47

A powerful thunderstorm accompanied by heavy rain caused a massive flash flood in the Safi region on Sunday night, December 14th, 2025. In less than an hour, the flooding resulted in loss of life, swept away several vehicles, and caused countless damage to infrastructure, homes, and hotels. [footage]

1.50

The flooding that hit the city of Safi following recent rains is neither new nor surprising. Every time it rains, the water level in Wadi al-Shabaab rises, causing a torrent to flow towards the old city, city Bodhab Square and the surrounding area. This is compounded by the massive coastal wall which should naturally drain water to the sea now being defended. [footage]

2,55

Local authorities reported a provisional death toll of 21 while 20 others were rescued and are being treated at a nearby hospital. Around 70 homes and shops in the old city, particularly on Bur Anzarin Street and Abu Alahab Square, were flooded. Local public authorities and all relevant sectors have initiated various emergency measures, mobilizing all logistical and human resources to continue the search for missing persons, conduct field interventions, and secure the affected areas, as well as provide the necessary support and assistance to the population affected by this extraordinary situation. [footage to end] M

[KE: Everything climate scientists predicted about global warming/ climate change since the 1970s is coming true, only faster]

heat wave

 

James Hansen 1988 Senate testimony on greenhouse effect/ coming climate crisis- transcript here, more coming shortly on humanity's greatest screwup, letting global warming happen, Heating Planet blog

Dr. Hansen: Mr. Chairman and committee members, thank you for the opportunity to present the results of my research on the greenhouse effect, which has been carried out with my colleagues at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. I would like to draw three main conclusions.

Number one, the Earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements. Number two, the global warming is now large enough that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship to the greenhouse effect. And number three, our computer climate simulations indicate that the greenhouse effect is already large enough to begin to affect the probability of extreme events such as summer heat waves.

*************

RECENT RELEVANT https://cityofangels25.blogspot.com/2025/12/1988-debate-on-climate-change-abc-news.html

****************************

My first viewgraph, which I would like to ask Suki to put up if he would, shows the global temperature over the period of instrumental records which is about 100 years. The present temperature is the highest in the period of record. The rate of warming in the past 25 years, as you can see on the right, is the highest on record. The four warmest years, as the Senator mentioned, have all been in the 1980s. And 1988 so far is so much warmer than 1987, that barring a remarkable and improbable cooling, 1988 will be the warmest year on the record.

Now let me turn to my second point which is causal association of the greenhouse effect and the global warming. Causal association requires first that the warming be larger than natural climate variability and, second, that the magnitude and nature of the warming be consistent with the greenhouse mechanism. These points are both addressed on my second viewgraph. The observed warming during the past 30 years, which is the period when we have accurate measurements of atmospheric composition, is shown by the heavy black line in this graph. The warming is almost 0.4 degrees Centigrade by 1987 relative to climatology, which is defined as the 30 year mean, 1950 to 1980 and, in fact, the warming is more than 0.4 degrees Centigrade in 1988.

The probability of a chance warming of that magnitude is about 1 percent. So, with 99 percent confidence we can state that the warming during this time period is a real warming trend. The other curves in this figure are the results of global climate model calculations for three scenarios of atmospheric trace gas growth. We have considered several scenarios because there are uncertainties in the exact trace gas growth in the past and especially in the future.

We have considered cases ranging from business as usual, which is scenario A, to draconian emission cuts, scenario C, which would totally eliminate net trace gas growth by year 2000. The main point to be made here is that the expected global warming is of the same magnitude as the observed warming. Since there is only a 1 percent chance of an accidental warming of this magnitude, the agreement with the expected greenhouse effect is of considerable significance.

Moreover, if you look at the next level of detail in the global temperature change, there are clear signs of the greenhouse effect. Observational data suggests a cooling in the stratosphere while the ground is warming. The data suggest somewhat more warming over land and sea ice regions than over open ocean, more warming at high latitudes than at low latitudes, and more warming in the winter than in the summer. In all of these cases, the signal is at best just beginning to emerge, and we need more data. 

Some of these details, such as the northern hemisphere high latitude temperature trends, do not look exactly like the greenhouse effect, but that is expected. There are certainly other climate change factors involved in addition to the greenhouse effect. Altogether the evidence that the Earth is warming by an amount which is too large to ba a chance fluctuation and the similarity of the warming to that expected from the greenhouse effect represents a very strong case, in my opinion, that the greenhouse effect has been detected, and it is changing our climate now.

Then my third point. Finally, I would like to address the question of whether the greenhouse effect is already large enough to affect the probability of extreme events, such as summer heat waves. As shown in my next viewgraph, we have used the temperature changes computed in our global climate model to estimate the impact of the greenhouse effect on the frequency of hot summers in Washington, D.C. and Omaha, Nebraska. A hot summer is defined as the hottest one-third of the summers in the 1950 to 1980 period, which is the period the Weather Bureau uses for defining climatology.

So, in that period the probability of having a hot summer was 33 percent, but by the 1990s, you can see that the greenhouse effect has increased the probability of a hot summer to somewhere between 55 and 70 percent in Washington according to our climate model simulations. In the late 1980s, the probability of a hot summer would be somewhat less than that. You can interpolate to a value of something like 40 to 60 percent. I believe that this change in the frequency of hot summers is large enough to be noticeable to the average person. So, we have already reached a point that the greenhouse effect is important.

It may also have important implications other than for creature comfort. My last viewgraph shows global maps of temperature anomalies for a particular month, July, for several different years between 1986 and 2029, as computed without global climate model for the intermediate trace gas scenario B. As shown by the graphs on the left where yellow and red colors represent areas that are warmer than climatology and blue areas represent areas that are colder than climatology, at the present time in the 1980s the greenhouse warming is smaller than the natural variability of the local temperature. So, in any given month, there is almost as much area that is cooler than normal as there is area warmer than normal. A few decades in the future, as shown on the right, it is warm almost everywhere

However, the point that I would like to make is that in the late 1980’s and in the 1990’s we notice a clear tendency in our model for greater than average warming in the southeast United States and the midwest. In our model this result seems to arise because the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of the United States warms more slowly than the land. This leads to high pressure along the east coast and circulation of warm air north into the midwest or the southeast.

There is only a tendency for this phenomenon. It is certainly an imperfect tool at this time. However, we conclude that there is evidence that the greenhouse effect increases the likelihood of heat wave drought situations in the southeast and midwest United States even though we cannot blame a specific drought on the greenhouse effect. Therefore, I believe that it is not a good idea to use the period 1950 to 1980 for which climatology is normally defined as an indication of how frequently droughts will occur in the future.

If our model is approximately correct, such situations may be more common in the next 10 to 15 years than they were in the period 1950 to 1980. Finally, I would like to stress that there is a need for improving these global climate models, and there is a need for global observations if we’re going to obtain a full understanding of these phenomena. That concludes my statement, and I’d be glad to answer questions if you’d like.

****************

PDF hwe: https://pulitzercenter.org/sites/default/files/june_23_1988_senate_hearing_1.pdf 

Primary Source: Excerpt of “Greenhouse Effect and Global Climate Change” the June 23, 1988 Hearing Before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate

Dec 13, 2007 If we stay on business as usual i think for even another decade or so then we are likely to get warming this century of several degrees fahrenheit and that would be really a different planet that would be the warmest that it has been since the middle pliocene that's about three million years ago and at that time there was no ice in the arctic during the summer and fall and sea level was about 25 meters which is about 80 feet higher than it is now so that is a very different planet about half a billion people now who live near the coastlines which would be underwater if we got a sea level rise of 80---

[MORE to Come shortly in Heating Planet blog's pursuit of the story of how humans failed to respond to this crisis as it plays out now out of our control and the propaganda industry continues to tell us what is happening before our eyes is not happening; and humans who have plastic in their brains believe the lies because it's easier to be stupid than to make a few sacrifices and change the way you live who cares about next generations- ke]

Sunday, December 14, 2025

Eerie! ABC News Nightline 1988 climate debate "hottest year on record"; Watch scientists say same truth 38 years ago they say today; 30-min broadcast w transcript, Heating Planet blog

09/07/88 "There's no ambiguity, the world is getting warmer unless we limit carbon dioxide emissions. Hottest four years on record occurred in this decade alone and 1988 will probably be the hottest year of all. Could that flooding in Bangladesh somehow be connected to the industrial revolution?" 1980s increases in world temperatures and frequency of natural disasters spark debate over the impact of CO2 emissions and the future of Earth. READ & WATCH: 1988 Debate on Climate Change- ABC News Nightline- transcript below   [Dhatner Method- If you like 1960's, 70's and '80s TV show & news clips, music and popular culture, fads, brilliant commercials, late night comedy, US presidential politics, space exploration, heroes, MLB, updates onmore, from Canada since Aug 2013]

developments create tomorrow's disasters? Good evening I'm Ted Koppel and this is Nightline.

From the greenhouse effect to the floods devastating Bangladesh to the forest fires sweeping the American West, the culprit may be man himself, and that's our story tonight.  This is ABC News Nightline reporting from Washington Ted Koppel.

Is it possible that the American passion for automobiles is somehow remotely responsible for the devastating floods that are now engulfing Bangladesh? Or try an even more remote indeed bizarre question, could that flooding somehow be connected to the industrial revolution, the mechanization of Great Britain and Northern Europe more than a hundred years ago?

Those questions are not quite as off-the-wall as they may seem. Indeed as the summers here in the United States seem to get hotter, we may be viewing with legitimate alarm the rise of fossil fueled industries in places like the People's Republic of China. We are, it turns out, in spite of all our best efforts at nationalism, just one planet after all. Here's Mark Parker.

1.40

The devastating floods in Bangladesh may just be an omen for low-lying coastal areas around the world.  Scientists predict a rise in temperatures that will eventually melt the polar ice caps causing the oceans to rise. Forest fires like those ripping through Yellowstone National Park now may also become more frequent. Even the story of old wives lake causes concern. Just last year on Canada's western plane the water in old wives Lake covered nearly 300 square miles. Today the lake is gone.

**This used to be one of the bigger salt lakes in southern Saskatchewan, and unfortunately due to the drought, it has completely dried up and now we're just walking over the dry salt bed.**

What's this were walking through then? 

**Some type of aquatic weed that was growing in the lake and they've all died and dried up now.**

Around the world scientists see a disturbing pattern. The hottest four years on record occurred in this decade alone and 1988 will probably be the hottest year of all. Some fear the so called greenhouse effect is beginning to wreak havoc. We are leaving a period of substantial climatic stability that has lasted for some hundreds even thousands of years and entering a period of very rapid changes in climate.  In its natural state, the Earth is gently warmed by a layer of carbon dioxide that traps some of the sun's heat waves as they are reflected by the globe. The greenhouse effect is the result of too much carbon dioxide and other pollutants which like a greenhouse are trapping more heat each year, now raising the surface temperatures.

3.30

Scientists say this effect began with the Industrial Revolution when the burning of coal gas and oil created man-made carbon dioxide. More than five billion tons of it pour into the air each year now throwing the atmosphere off-balance. At the same time third world nations in search of wood and cropland are destroying the tropical rainforests at a rate of 27 million acres a year, an area that's nearly the size of Great Britain. Left alone these trees would have consumed carbon dioxide helping to keep the atmosphere in balance.

That leaves us with a planet that's warming up and dry this past summer in places like the American Midwest and Canada. Some scientists disagree. They believe the current drought which dried-up old wives lake here in Canada and as tormenting American farmers is simply the result of natural variations in climate, not the greenhouse effect, but most scientists do agree the earth is warming; and if this dry lakebed isn't the result of the greenhouse effect, it does show what could happen throughout the world in our lifetime.

4.38

If pollution and deforestation continue at the current rate, scientists predict the average global temperatures could rise from 4 to 9 degrees in just 40 to 60 years, maybe earlier, if pollution accelerates. Keep in mind that a 4 degree average temperature difference is all that separates our current climate from that of the Ice Age which ended 10,000 years ago.

**If the planet warms by as much as 9 or 10 degrees Fahrenheit, we will be outside the climatic regime that has been experienced in the last million years.**

5.16

Some areas will heat faster than others. this map prepared by NASA shows in red the areas that scientists predict will feel the worst heat rises in the upcoming years. Note the American Midwest where rising temperatures could destroy the rich cropland the growing climate would move north into less suitable terrain.

**One could consider quite conceivably a significant reduction in the production of grain that would mean one would go from a net exporter of food to a net import food. that clearly would have some significance for the political balance between the various superpowers of the world.** Scientists say that predicting greenhouse effects is relatively easy; the hard part is convincing all the countries of the world to make sacrifices for what must be global solutions. 

**Norway: We have come to a point in history when we can no longer act primarily as citizens of any single nation state; we are irreversibly entitled to the same destiny.** 

At a recent conference in Toronto scientists from around the world called for an unprecedented global law of the atmosphere. Currently the worst carbon dioxide polluters in the world are the industrial nations led by the United States and the Soviet Union. Scientists say those countries must take drastic steps to conserve energy and develop new fuels.

Ironically, this may bring nuclear power into greater favour. Politically the developing nations are an even bigger problem. For example, how do we sway China which is basing its new economy on energy from its abundant coal supplies.

**I think that it's going to be necessary to provide technology transfer to the Chinese; I think it's going to be necessary to provide incentives for them to follow their different options. I think we're going to have to pay a price and it will not be cheap.**

It also won't be cheap to stop deforestation in Brazil where poverty-stricken farmers are cutting down the rainforests in order to eke out a living.

**The richer developed world such as the United States and Europe have to work with Brazil to rectify that situation we have to believe that we may have to pay for reforestation.**

The point is everyone will have to pay since scientists say global warming is already beginning. The world's political leaders face a unique challenge now the preservation of the one resource shared by all nations on Earth.

**It is time that we realize that we all share a common future. The setting is urgent and the threats are real.**

For Nightline this is Mark Potter in southwestern Canada.

Koppel: When we come back, we'll be joined by two scientists who are specialists in the effect of atmospheric changes on the weather, Michael Oppenheimer of the private Environmental Defense Fund and Allen Hecht of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. This is ABC News Nightline brought to you by Bahia.

COMMERCIAL

There are still a few cars you can buy for under six grand including this new import Pontiac LeMans [Music] [Applause] and if you're a qualified first-time youth car buyer a brand-new Pontiac LeMans can be yours for just fifty seven ninety-nine; oh look at me back in the 60s working up a sweat oh and that's how I used to pump iron not today today were exercising more and eating less red meat but red meat is a great source of iron only Kellogg's bran flakes has high fiber and 100% of the iron recommended today so now I pump a little iron outside and inside you know I haven't felt this good since I burned that bathing suit Kellogg's bran flakes; don't miss this gigantic selling extravaganza it's the fifth annual home decorating and remodeling show at Nashville's Convention Center on September 8th 9th 10th and 11th with hundreds of booths and thousands of new and interesting products ideas and information galore building a home decorating or remodeling don't miss this event it's the fifth annual home decorating and remodeling show at the Nashville's Convention Center on September 8th 9th 10th and 11th be their feet extra spending money appeal and show park has lots of interesting jobs to film for the rest of the season; thank you outside jobs an inside job body and weekends through September weekends only in October the pay is good it works fun and no special trainings required and listen you can sign up and are hired by September 12th you can qualify for a $100 fall bonus apply in person at Opryland park personnel 2802 upper land drive monday through saturday between nine and five more Americans get their news from ABC News than from any other source to expect the world from ABC News.

10.34

Koppel: Michael Oppenheimer is a specialist in atmospheric physics at the Environmental Defense Fund, a non-profit public interest group. He joins us from our Boston bureau.  Alan Hecht who is in our Washington bureau is director of the national climate program at the national ocean oceanographic and atmospheric administration. His office is responsible for planning and reviewing federal policy on issues such as the greenhouse effect. Dr. Oppenheimer, I'd love to be able to say to you that I think the American public can get energized over some perceived threat forty years down the road but I don't believe it. Do you? 

**Well I think that they can. This summer has provided us with a vivid example of the kinds of changes that are in store for us if we don't move to limit the greenhouse gases- record heat, record droughts, record smog levels, forest fires putting our forests up in flames; it doesn't matter whether this summer was due to the greenhouse effect and in fact we'll never know whether it was or wasn't. The bottom line is that the long term warming will occur as long as greenhouse gases are emitted.** 

Koppel: Well forgive me but I think it does matter; if it was not caused if it is simply coincidence that these that four of the hottest years we've ever had or four of the hottest summers have occurred in this decade that's one thing. If it is the consequence of the greenhouse effect and you can draw some kind of a correlation there, then presumably we can present evidence to the American public and say, look, it may happen in 40 years it may happen in 60 years; but folks there's disaster that far down the road and there are some really bad things that are gonna happen maybe 10 years from now or five years from now, would that be true? 

**Well there's a long term trend which has been which has been predicted for nearly a hundred years. In the late 1800s scientists predicted that the emissions of carbon dioxide due to industry would eventually warm the world. Over the last 10 or 20 years, computer models have enabled us to say roughly how much the world will warm, given a certain amount of emissions; and over the last three or four years, several analyses have been produced which are consistent with the predictions of the computer models. The last I hasn't been dotted, the last T hasn't been crossed; but the fact that the world appears to have been measured to be warmer than it was a hundred years ago gives us confidence in the computer models, which tell us that as long as we emit these gases, the world is just going to continue to warm and at record rates.

Koppel: Dr. Hecht, is that a controversial statement or can you accept it in its broad principle?

**I think there's general agreement in the scientific community that the greenhouse effect this phenomena is real it's something that society will have to deal with as long as society contributes these gases to the atmosphere; but there is a great deal of controversy and a great deal of uncertainty about the timing of the magnitude and the direct consequences of the greenhouse effect, and I think a question that you raise is really one of the most important.

There is a lot going on in the world that reflects the climatology whether it be the drought in the Midwest this past summer or floods or fires or extreme events; and I think there is a stronger feeling in the scientific community that much of the results of what we're seeing are probably best explained explained by the natural variability in the system at this time than the greenhouse effect and that's important. Because it means that the scientific community, which has a burden and responsibility to deal with this, has to come up with the methodology, has to come up with the means, has to come up with the strategy to really convince those who have to make policy that these changes are in fact due to man.**

Koppel: Dr. Oppenheimer, don't often remember at some point or another. I mean there are not many opportunities when someone with your background in expertise or dr. hick has a chance to talk to several million Americans at the same time say hey, Dr. Hecht, you know dummies wake up, what we are all doing here is causing a problem; now you can either say it in in such a way that people sort of doze off while you're saying it or you can say it in such a way as to convey a sense of alarm, are you alarmed?

14.45

**I'm concerned; I don't think it's an emergency I think we have plenty of time to act; but if we don't start actions today to limit the emissions of these gases, we're going to be building in an irreversible change; and we're going to be leaving for the next generation a world which is moving downhill towards uninhabitability. Personally, I think the changes that we're seeing this summer are not only characteristic of the sorts of things we'll see more and more often in the future, but have been made more likely by the greenhouse gases we've already put into the atmosphere. So yes we're moving slowly into into a greenhouse world and this is a sample of things to come but that's not really the important point. The important point is this, that the changes are irreversible; and that there's a lag between the emissions of the gases and the full manifestation of their consequences. So we can't move into this world casually look about and decide we don't like it and go back there will be no going back.

Koppel: How much of a lag; in other words, when I raised that that question at the beginning of the broadcast and said events that took place a hundred years ago in Great Britain Northern Europe the Industrial Revolution the burning of coal, is it possible that that is having an effect today. In some regions of the world?

**Sure, there's a lag of what some scientists think is about 40 years between the emissions of the gas, is it a manifestation of their full consequence. Let's remember, we're doing an experiment here. The theory was really put together a hundred years ago; the experiment is now being done.

We scientists have measured that the world does appear to be warmer than a hundred years ago, and that's consistent with what the models predict, in spite of any uncertainties. We've done an experiment and we've confirmed tended to confirm the theory. That's important it means yes it does appear the world is already warmer due to these greenhouse gases.**

Koppel: Let me ask you to stop for a moment we're gonna have to take a break when we come back we'll be joined by an international lawyer concerned with the problem of bridging the gap between scientific concerns and political realities doctor Ramakrishna. 

16.45

COMMERCIALS

[Music] got dinner in the bag success boiling bag easy so delicious look for our coupons in this Sunday's paper and I don't want anyone driving my xt while I'm away do you understand the new super rule xt six has a purpose of cylinder engine computerized full-time four-wheel drive and a design which makes it hard to resist somebody drove my car who was it up to one thousand dollars cash back from Subaru me is a great deal on a great car grapefruit juice no Ocean Spray pink grapefruit juice cocktail it's not what you think it's not bitter sweeter it's all yours Ocean Spray pink it's time its year-end clearance time time to get the deal of the year on a new and factory - dealer cash incentives can add hundreds to your savings on a Mazda truck it's time time to clear out all the 88 Mazdas year in clearance time get a great Mazda deal in Hopkinsville Madison cook bill Murphy's bar holding game Clarksville and Louisville the law offices of Williams and Miller a good firm to have on your side if you've been hurt in an accident we take the mystery out of seeing a lawyer the Williams and Miller policy with accident claims is simple you can see us for free and we're not paid unless we win your claim and you collect if you've been hurt in an accident needs someone to look out for your best interests we'd like to help we invite you to call us Williams and Miller on your side there are those times when you work on a family all week and everyone looks just so their clothes all clean and fresh and everything smelling so sweet and good and someone says about you little girl laughs she smells so good you just wanna hug her you can just peel yourself puffing up your that proud the huggable smell of sunshine scent cane it makes a mama proud an ABC News environmental alerts the horrors of a polluted world could happen Hugh Downs explores burning questions the poisoning of America Thursday they don't know enough about this country and it is not their ignorance is not the cause of their policy Charlie Gibson his experience shows weekdays on Good Morning America.

19.40

Koppel: If you've been reading your newspapers or watching the news on television, you know that there are now roughly some 25 million homeless in Bangladesh. Bangladesh is a country on the Indian subcontinent; it is a nation about the size of Wisconsin, but with a population of 100 million people nearly half the population of the United States. 75% of that country is now under water in one of the worst natural disasters of this century, Dr. Killa Ponty Ramakrishna is a professor of international law in New Delhi and a senior associate at the Woods Hole Research Center in Massachusetts. He is trying to make the world aware of the international responsibility for dealing with and if possible preventing such calamities. The first of two international conferences he is organizing is due to take place in Woods Hole next week. Dr. Ramakrishna joins us now from Boston. 

We began by talking about Bangladesh because one of the things I hope we can do over these next few minutes is indicate that there is a tie in, a connection between what happens for example in Bangladesh and what we have been doing or what some of our other industrial country allies and friends have been doing over the last 30 40 perhaps even 100 years. Are we going to find over the next few years that other countries are going to be doing to us what we've been doing to them, Dr. Ramakrishna?

What I'm trying to get to is the industrial age in this country our use of fossil fuels may have caused some of the environmental disasters in other parts of the world. What I was asking you is are there now other parts of the world that are engaged in the same thing so that we may feel the effect of it perhaps twenty years down the road?

21.40

**Most certainly; they they have begun a process of industrialization which is very much like the process that the displaced nations have adopted not long ago; and they have adopted it because they feel that is the only way to achieve the economic development levels that the industrial nations have reached now; and so they are pretty much going to go along those lines. And as you said if that were to continue in 20 or 30 years you would see the problem a lot more aggravated than it is already now**

Koppel: Well what if the United States the Soviet Union Japan for example all of these countries which now are perhaps ready to move a step beyond the fossil fuel-burning stage were to say, let's say the countries like the People's Republic of China, look you can't do it, you can't burn that coal, how are they likely to respond?

**Oh that would be preposterous, that would never be accepted, it would never be accepted, because you know you go through your levels of development; and then turn around and tell the developing countries that you cannot develop to the same levels as we have. What I would suggest is that they should in turn talk about providing for the same kind of economic development; but in a different path, a path that does not rely upon the burning of fossil fuels. rely upon the same kind of development techniques that the developed nations have adopted**

Koppel: Dr. Hecht, what do you think the chances are of politically here in this country what you have been saying and what dr. Oppenheimer have been saying of being accepted sufficiently that we're prepared to for example transfer some of our high technology to the People's Republic of China so that they won't have to burn coal?

23.32

**I think how the international community is going to deal with this problem is yet to be worked out and I think in looking at what is being done in terms of national debt in Africa and Brazil and other areas, there are innovative ways of dealing with it both through taxes and interest rates and technology; but the international community as a whole is only now beginning to begin to assess the implications of greenhouse gases and come up with ideas about what to do about it.

I would just like to go back to one point that you made earlier just not to leave the impression that the flooding in Bangladesh today is a direct consequence of this greenhouse warming; because I think it would be very difficult to to show that to be the case, and in fact I think as I said earlier, many of the anomalous climatic conditions that one observes around the world down in the past can probably better be explained through natural events; and it's only a question of at what time in the future events like continued droughts can be really attributed to greenhouse warming. But I think it's important not to leave the impression that this is a phenomenon that's related to the greenhouse effect.

Koppel: All right giving us that kind of an opening, dr. Hecht, I suspect is going to make it possible for politicians in this country to put off what may be painful choices so I'd like to talk about those painful choices when we return and continue our discussion in a moment.

COMMERCIALS

But don't take my word for it for yourself I'll simply present you a small imperfection in a part can be overlooked by the human eye that's why Ford has installed vision machines like this and many of our engine and transmission assembly lines these machines help detect imperfections before they are assembled in our cars and trucks at Ford we believe in prevention this profile is one reason Ford Motor Company has designed and built the highest quality American cars and trucks on average for eight years running at Ford quality is job one the sandwich is kind of left hanging without the great taste of elastic pickles crunchy delicious plastic pickles as importantly a sandwich as the bread what a great evening I hope it's not over yet gotta tell you right now I shouldn't be doing this I'm a married woman that's okay I'm on the Hardman Mary very happily oh wait okay well happy anniversary [Music] Stephen it's pure an anniversary ring of fine quality diamonds the gift that says you'd marry her all over again don't miss this gigantic selling extravaganza it's the fifth annual home decorating and remodeling show at Nashville's Convention Center on September 8th 9th 10th and 11th with hundreds of booths and thousands of new and interesting products ideas and information galore building a home decorating or remodeling don't miss this event it's the fifth annual home decorating and remodeling show at the Nashville's Convention Center on September 8th 9th 10th and 11th be there.

27.15

Back now is dr. Michael Oppenheimer dr. Oppenheimer, telling Americans that they're not going to be able to use their cars or at least not to the degree that they have in the past is not going to be a popular message; now if there is ambiguity about how dangerous this situation is, you're certainly not going to be able to convince Americans not to use their cars.

**There's no ambiguity the world is getting warmer unless we limit carbon dioxide emissions and it's not a matter of throwing out cars there are short-term measures like moving to more mileage efficient cars which by the way would get rid of smog and acid rain in the process; and then long-term measures like the federal government investing heavily in research and development on solar energy. It's not a matter of pain pain pain it's a matter of smart start a slow process efficiency measures now dollars now to produce renewable energy sources later.

Koppel: all right dr. Hecht I didn't want to leave the impression that the Los Angeles Thruway is somehow responsible directly for the the flooding in Bangladesh; but are we at least and we've only got a few seconds for you to respond; are we at least going to accept the fact that there is an interrelationship here between what one country does and the impact on another?

**I think there is and I think we have good examples of areas of being deforested that given heavy rain the rain has a greater impact on it. I think what we're seeing in general across the world is that society is very much linked together and may be becoming more vulnerable to even natural climate variability. Question in front of the society in front of American public is a question of risk what is the risk involved?**

**Oppenheimer: I think I'd just like to say I think the risks are very high and Alan is sloughing over a lot of differences there. The fact is this is the kind of thing we're gonna get more of and I'd like to know where are the presidential candidates on this; we haven't heard much we're hearing about the Pledge of Allegiance; but the question isn't the loyalty of presidential candidates. The question is are they gonna have the ability to deal with this problem.

Koppel: On that rhetorical question gentlemen I have to thank you I'm sorry we're out of time but I'm deeply appreciative dr. Oppenheimer dr. Hecht dr. Ramakrishna;  thank you very much that's our report for tonight. I'm Ted Koppel in Washington for all of us here at ABC News this has been Nightline for a printed transcript please send three dollars to Nightline transcripts 267 Broadway New York New York one triple 0 two 7 Nightline is a presentation of ABC News. FINIS

[KE: Everything climate scientists predicted about global warming/ climate change since the 1970s is coming true, only faster][How the hell did we end up in this mess when we knew 40 years ago how to prevent it?]